I believe this was the first version. The more detailed version came later (see previous post). I like this one better. It’s the more psychological of the two. Eliminating all the “stuff,” I focused completely on her face. All the territory I tried to understand could be found around the eyes and nose and mouth and jaw. Lights and darks appear with the logic of a flashlight beamed toward something. It is all incomplete. It’s a random visual journey. Except that it isn’t random, rather only seemingly so.
When your mind wanders, it doesn’t take a random journey. It journeys to where the interest lies. My eyes moved through the picture, and my hand drew whatever had caught my momentary attention. And my attention kept coming back to the interior of the face, searching out the interior of the woman’s painted thoughts.
Isn’t that the amazing thing about Picasso’s picture, that he painted someone thinking? And in making a copy of his painting, I caught a few of the lady’s thoughts too. Her thoughts, Picasso’s thoughts, my thoughts are all somewhere in the mix.
Who says that making a copy is just an exercise?
[Top of the post: Drawing after Picasso’s portrait of Corina Romeu, by Aletha Kuschan]